TY - JOUR
T1 - A reflection on faces seen under mirror reversal
AU - Suchow, Jordan
AU - McDowell, Malerie
AU - Huang, Jessica
AU - Haberman, Jason
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/11/1
Y1 - 2024/11/1
N2 - Much of our visual experience of faces, including our own, is mediated by technology, for example when a digital photo depicts a mirror reversal of reality. How does this difference in visual experience affect judgments about appearance? Here, we asked participants to view their likeness in photographs that were reversed (as when viewed in a mirror) or not reversed (as when viewed directly). Observers also perceptually adapted (or not) to the reversed or non-reversed images in a 2 × 2 design. Observers then rated how much each photograph resembled them and how much they liked their appearance in the photograph, later repeating the procedure for images of close friends. We found that non-reversed images are perceived as more “unlike” one's self and less pleasant than reversed images; the pattern disappears when evaluating close friends, where the non-reversed image is the more familiar, with adaptation having asymmetric effects. Experiment 1A was fully replicated seven years later. These results are likely driven by a strong, albeit malleable, visual representation of self, born of technology mediated experience and activated when an unfamiliar perspective exposes facial asymmetries. We conclude by considering the downstream effects of these preferences on consumer and social behavior.
AB - Much of our visual experience of faces, including our own, is mediated by technology, for example when a digital photo depicts a mirror reversal of reality. How does this difference in visual experience affect judgments about appearance? Here, we asked participants to view their likeness in photographs that were reversed (as when viewed in a mirror) or not reversed (as when viewed directly). Observers also perceptually adapted (or not) to the reversed or non-reversed images in a 2 × 2 design. Observers then rated how much each photograph resembled them and how much they liked their appearance in the photograph, later repeating the procedure for images of close friends. We found that non-reversed images are perceived as more “unlike” one's self and less pleasant than reversed images; the pattern disappears when evaluating close friends, where the non-reversed image is the more familiar, with adaptation having asymmetric effects. Experiment 1A was fully replicated seven years later. These results are likely driven by a strong, albeit malleable, visual representation of self, born of technology mediated experience and activated when an unfamiliar perspective exposes facial asymmetries. We conclude by considering the downstream effects of these preferences on consumer and social behavior.
KW - adaptation
KW - aesthetics
KW - face recognition
KW - social perception
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205714899&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85205714899&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/03010066241279606
DO - 10.1177/03010066241279606
M3 - Article
C2 - 39351699
AN - SCOPUS:85205714899
SN - 0301-0066
VL - 53
SP - 763
EP - 774
JO - Perception
JF - Perception
IS - 11-12
ER -