TY - GEN
T1 - Assessing NEOWISE’s Lifecycle and Obsolescence
T2 - AIAA AVIATION FORUM AND ASCEND, 2025
AU - Natesh Babu, Rashika Sugganahalli
AU - Nilchiani, Roshanak
AU - Caddell, J. D.
AU - Taramsari, Hossein Basereh
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This paper applies the Extended Technology Readiness Level (eTRL) framework to the full operational lifecycle of the WISE/NEOWISE mission, offering a post-deployment assessment of system maturity and obsolescence. Unlike the conventional TRL model, which ends at initial deployment, eTRL incorporates the evolution of requirements (R), system environment (SE), and performance (P) over time. Using this framework, we map key mission phases, initial deployment, cryogen exhaustion, hibernation, reactivation, extended operations, and decommissioning, against quantitative sufficiency scores. The analysis captures how system readiness dynamically changed in response to internal degradation (e.g., loss of cryogenic cooling) and external shifts (e.g., evolving planetary defense mandates and orbital decay). Through sufficiency mapping and phase-by-phase eTRL assignments, we illustrate how NEOWISE transitioned between full capability (eTRL 10), partial alignment (eTRL 11-12), and eventual functional retirement (eTRL 13-14). The case study demonstrates how eTRL enables better lifecycle decision-making, especially for long-duration missions not designed for servicing or upgrades. This analysis also underscores the importance of contextual alignment in determining when a system is truly obsolete. By applying a structured post-launch readiness metric, the eTRL framework bridges the critical assessment gap between operational maturity and strategic obsolescence in space systems.
AB - This paper applies the Extended Technology Readiness Level (eTRL) framework to the full operational lifecycle of the WISE/NEOWISE mission, offering a post-deployment assessment of system maturity and obsolescence. Unlike the conventional TRL model, which ends at initial deployment, eTRL incorporates the evolution of requirements (R), system environment (SE), and performance (P) over time. Using this framework, we map key mission phases, initial deployment, cryogen exhaustion, hibernation, reactivation, extended operations, and decommissioning, against quantitative sufficiency scores. The analysis captures how system readiness dynamically changed in response to internal degradation (e.g., loss of cryogenic cooling) and external shifts (e.g., evolving planetary defense mandates and orbital decay). Through sufficiency mapping and phase-by-phase eTRL assignments, we illustrate how NEOWISE transitioned between full capability (eTRL 10), partial alignment (eTRL 11-12), and eventual functional retirement (eTRL 13-14). The case study demonstrates how eTRL enables better lifecycle decision-making, especially for long-duration missions not designed for servicing or upgrades. This analysis also underscores the importance of contextual alignment in determining when a system is truly obsolete. By applying a structured post-launch readiness metric, the eTRL framework bridges the critical assessment gap between operational maturity and strategic obsolescence in space systems.
KW - Asteroid Detection
KW - Cryogenic Cooling
KW - Earth
KW - European Space Agency
KW - NASA
KW - Space Systems
KW - Sun Synchronous Orbit
KW - Technology Readiness Level
KW - Telescopes
KW - Wide Field Infrared Survey Explorer
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105018062945
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105018062945#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.2514/6.2025-4136
DO - 10.2514/6.2025-4136
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105018062945
SN - 9781624107382
T3 - AIAA Aviation Forum and ASCEND, 2025
BT - AIAA AVIATION FORUM AND ASCEND, 2025
Y2 - 21 July 2025 through 25 July 2025
ER -