Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

CEO Accountability for Corporate Fraud: Evidence from the Split Share Structure Reform in China

  • Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
  • University of Edinburgh
  • University of Manchester

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

77 Scopus citations

Abstract

We use institutional-related theories and a unique natural experiment that enables an exogenous test of the influence of controlling shareholders on managerial accountability to corporate fraud. In China, prior to the Split Share Structure Reform (SSSR), state shareholders held restricted shares that could not be traded. This restriction mitigated state-owned enterprise controlling shareholders’ incentives to monitor managers. The data examined show the SSSR strengthens incentives of state-owned enterprise controlling shareholders to replace fraudulent management. Our findings support the view that economic incentives are important to promote corporate governance and deter fraud.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)787-806
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume138
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2016

Keywords

  • CEO turnover
  • China
  • Corporate fraud
  • Ownership
  • Split Share Structure Reform

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'CEO Accountability for Corporate Fraud: Evidence from the Split Share Structure Reform in China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this