Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Current Applications, Research Gaps, and Future Perspectives in Design of Resilient Patient-Facing Generative AI Applications: A Rapid Review

  • Stevens Institute of Technology

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

Abstract

Generative AI (GenAI) technologies, such as ChatGPT are increasingly being used by patients for healthcare applications, raising alarms about their reliability, safety, and appropriateness for patient care use cases. This rapid review synthesizes current research on the evaluation of patient-facing generative AI-based solutions in healthcare settings. We hope to summarize the scientific literature on emerging use cases, highlighting risks, mitigation strategies, and research gaps for future evaluation. This study aims to evaluate studies of generative AI applications with direct patient involvement. We conducted a rapid review using adapted PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching in PubMed for studies published between January 2023 and January 2025. Articles were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria, focusing on the evaluation of patient-facing applications. Our review resulted in 25 full-text studies. Potential applications include patient question answering, patient education material development, patient-friendly clinical report generation, patient self-management, mental health chatbots, and patient-reported outcome data collection. While early studies demonstrate promising outcomes such as increasing readability and patient comprehension, significant concerns persist around misinformation, hallucinations, and privacy concerns. Mitigation strategies include tailoring patient education on prompt design, retrieval-augmented generation, and transparency mechanisms. Key open questions remain about preserving privacy while incorporating patient preferences, building trust, and ensuring equitable access, especially for lower literacy populations. Very few studies focus on the evaluation of patient perspectives on generative AI technologies. This review underscores the urgent need to involve patients in the design and evaluation of these tools, given the increased access to free tools available to the public to inform future application design, policy development, and safe and effective usage.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1210-1216
Number of pages7
JournalProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Volume69
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2025
Event69th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, HFES 2025 - Chicago, United States
Duration: 13 Oct 202517 Oct 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • digital health tools
  • generative AI
  • healthcare
  • human-centered AI
  • patient engagement
  • patient safety
  • patient-facing technology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Current Applications, Research Gaps, and Future Perspectives in Design of Resilient Patient-Facing Generative AI Applications: A Rapid Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this