Directors’ duties of care and the value of auditing

Suman Banerjee, Mark Humphery-Jenner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper uses court's decision in ASIC v Healy (The Centro Case) as a natural experiment through which to empirically examine, and demonstrate, the importance of strengthening directors’ duties of care. The Centro decision strengthened directors’ duties of care by requiring them to make an independent assessment of auditors’ reports, rather than merely relying on auditors’ statements. It also required them to have a base level of financial literacy and to look for, and notice, obvious issues, especially ones that are important in the context. The paper assesses the impact of the Centro case by analyzing whether Centro increased the market value of auditing expenditure. The results are positive: the strengthened directors duties are associated with higher CARs for firms that spend more on auditing. Further, after Centro, auditing expenditure had a more positive relationship with market values. Overall, the results demonstrate the importance of strengthening directors’ duties of care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalFinance Research Letters
Volume19
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2016

Keywords

  • ASIC v Healey
  • Audit committee
  • Centro
  • Companies Act Section 174
  • Corporations Act Section 180
  • Duty of care
  • Financial Reporting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Directors’ duties of care and the value of auditing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this