Disruption and deception in crowdsourcing

Agnieszka Onuchowska, Gert Jan De Vreede

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

While crowdsourcing has become increasingly popular among organizations, it also has become increasingly susceptible to unethical and malicious activities. This article discusses recent examples of disruptive and deceptive efforts on crowdsourcing sites, which impacted the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the crowdsourcing efforts' service, stakeholders, and data. From these examples, the authors derive an organizing framework of risk types associated with disruption and deception in crowdsourcing based on commonalities among incidents. The framework includes prank activities, the intentional placement of false information, hacking attempts, DDoS attacks, botnet attacks, privacy violation attempts, and data breaches. Finally, the authors discuss example controls that can assist in identifying and mitigating disruption and deception risks in crowdsourcing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-41
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journals of e-Collaboration
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2017

Keywords

  • Confidentiality-Integrity-Availability (CIA)
  • Controls Crowdsourcing
  • Cybersecurity
  • Deception
  • Disruption
  • Online Pranks
  • Open Innovation
  • Risks
  • Threats

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disruption and deception in crowdsourcing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this