Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Does Speculative News Hurt Productivity? Evidence from Takeover Rumors

  • Christian Andres
  • , Dmitry Bazhutov
  • , Douglas Cumming
  • , Gerrit Köchling
  • , Peter Limbach
  • Otto Beisheim School of Management
  • University of Wuppertal
  • TU Dortmund University
  • Bielefeld University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

We show that productivity at both the firm and employee (i.e., analyst and inventor) level temporarily declines upon announcements of takeover rumors that do not materialize. Such speculative news may hurt productivity because uncertainty and the threat of job loss cause anxiety, distraction, and reduced commitment among employees and managers. Consistently, we observe a more pronounced productivity dip for rumored targets and when the likelihood of job loss is higher. Firm performance mirrors these results. We find no indication of reverse causality. The evidence fosters our understanding of potential real effects of speculative financial news and the costs of takeover threats.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does Speculative News Hurt Productivity? Evidence from Takeover Rumors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this