TY - JOUR
T1 - Erratum
T2 - EFNet: evidence fusion network for tumor segmentation from PET-CT volumes (Phys. Med. Biol. (2021) 66 (205005) DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac299a)
AU - Diao, Zhaoshuo
AU - Jiang, Huiyan
AU - Han, Xian Hua
AU - Yao, Yu Dong
AU - Shi, Tianyu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Institute of Physics Publishing. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/12/21
Y1 - 2021/12/21
N2 - Due to an error that occurred during the production process, two paragraphs that were the intended content of sections 4.3 and 4.5.1 were deleted from this paper. Please find the missing paragraphs below: 4.3. Evaluation measures The evaluation measures are Dice, Sensitivity, Precision and IOU. Define TP as true positive, FP as false positive,TNas true negative and FN as false negative. Then Dice=2TP/(2TP+FP+FN), Sensitivity=TP/(TP+FN), Precision=TP/(TP+FP), IOU=TP/(TP+FP+FN). 4.5.1. Single modal versus multimodal The highest effect of single modal is PET E-Net. The Dice value is 0.74, which is lower than the Dice value of 0.78 in the method proposed in this paper. In addition, the Dice value of CT E-Net based on CT modal is only 0.40, and the Dice value of CT E-Net+Fusion based on fusion with PET feature map after upsampling is 0.72. Therefore, if the multi-modal fusion method is feasible, the multi-modal approach is better than the singlemodal approach because it provides more information.
AB - Due to an error that occurred during the production process, two paragraphs that were the intended content of sections 4.3 and 4.5.1 were deleted from this paper. Please find the missing paragraphs below: 4.3. Evaluation measures The evaluation measures are Dice, Sensitivity, Precision and IOU. Define TP as true positive, FP as false positive,TNas true negative and FN as false negative. Then Dice=2TP/(2TP+FP+FN), Sensitivity=TP/(TP+FN), Precision=TP/(TP+FP), IOU=TP/(TP+FP+FN). 4.5.1. Single modal versus multimodal The highest effect of single modal is PET E-Net. The Dice value is 0.74, which is lower than the Dice value of 0.78 in the method proposed in this paper. In addition, the Dice value of CT E-Net based on CT modal is only 0.40, and the Dice value of CT E-Net+Fusion based on fusion with PET feature map after upsampling is 0.72. Therefore, if the multi-modal fusion method is feasible, the multi-modal approach is better than the singlemodal approach because it provides more information.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122898816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85122898816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/1361-6560/ac37fd
DO - 10.1088/1361-6560/ac37fd
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 34866596
AN - SCOPUS:85122898816
SN - 0031-9155
VL - 66
JO - Physics in Medicine and Biology
JF - Physics in Medicine and Biology
IS - 24
M1 - 249501
ER -