Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Estimating days needed for dietary assessment in pregnancy: a modeling study

  • Stevens Institute of Technology
  • United States Military Academy at West Point
  • New York University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Dietary assessment is essential for understanding associations between diet and health. The number of days of dietary data collection must account for high variation in daily intakes, while balancing accuracy with participant burden. Although several methods exist for determining the optimal amount, few have been applied to pregnancy. Objectives: This study aimed to algorithmically determine the number of days needed to accurately estimate key dietary characteristics: energy, macronutrients, macronutrient density, diet quality, and intake timing during pregnancy. Methods: We analyzed dietary data from 147 pregnant individuals in the Temporal Research in Eating, Nutrition, and Diet during Pregnancy study. Each participant provided ≤28 d of image-based dietary records to determine nutrients. Using mixed-effects models and assuming the only source of error is day-to-day variation in diet, we calculated the number of days required for the correlation between estimated and true intake to be ≥0.90 (NR) and for estimated intake to be within 20% of true intake (NC) for: energy, absolute macronutrients, macronutrient density, healthy eating index 2020 score (HEI 2020), and intake timing. Using bootstrapping, we extended NC into a probabilistic framework linking methodological choices to practical consequences. Results: Within-person coefficient of variation (CVW) exceeded between-person coefficient of variation (CVB) for all characteristics, with fat (g) having the largest difference (CVW = 40.6; CVB = 26.2). Macronutrients required the most days to estimate usual absolute intake (fat: 17 d), whereas macronutrient density (% calories from fat: 5 d), HEI 2020 (5 d), and intake timing (2–6 d) required fewer. Individual-level analysis showed that cohort-based estimates underestimated the number of days needed for accurate assessment, as only 56% of participants met the cohort-level requirement for HEI. Conclusions: We provide a new approach to estimating required dietary days to inform future study design. Existing studies may be underpowered, and cohort estimates may overstate individual-level accuracy.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101120
JournalAmerican Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume123
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2026

Keywords

  • chrononutrition dietary recall
  • dietary assessment
  • dietary variation
  • power analysis
  • pregnancy
  • type of day analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Estimating days needed for dietary assessment in pregnancy: a modeling study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this