TY - JOUR
T1 - High-Enthalpy Effects on Hypersonic Boundary-Layer Transition
T2 - Experimental and Numerical Comparison
AU - Hameed, Ahsan
AU - Parziale, Nick J.
AU - Kuehl, Joseph
AU - Liang, Tony
AU - Graziose, Kevin
AU - Brehm, Christoph
AU - Dungan, Sean David
AU - Brazier, Jean Philippe
AU - Paquin, Laura
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by Ahsan Hameed.
PY - 2025/9
Y1 - 2025/9
N2 - In this paper, results from two experiments performed at California Institute of Technology’s T5 free-piston reflected shock tunnel are compared to numerical stability computations conducted using various stability analysis tools. The goal of this comparison is to begin understanding the range of boundary-layer transition predictability using different stability approaches for high-enthalpy flows. The analysis is focused on the physics of the second-mode instability at high enthalpy and the role of high-temperature effects. Although the stability solvers considering thermochemical nonequilibrium were best at estimating the measured second-mode frequency (f2M ≈ 1250 kHz for shot 2990, f2M ≈ 1235 kHz for shot 3019), they overpredicted the most amplified frequency by approximately 16–23%. A moderate spread in the predicted most amplified frequency was also observed between the different solvers. The solvers estimated a most amplified frequency range of approximately 1450–1550 kHz for shot 2990 and approximately 1525–1650 kHz for shot 3019. There was also significant inconsistency observed in predicting the peak N-factor magnitude, ranging from N = 12.5–16 for shot 2990 and from N = 12.3–19 for shot 3019.
AB - In this paper, results from two experiments performed at California Institute of Technology’s T5 free-piston reflected shock tunnel are compared to numerical stability computations conducted using various stability analysis tools. The goal of this comparison is to begin understanding the range of boundary-layer transition predictability using different stability approaches for high-enthalpy flows. The analysis is focused on the physics of the second-mode instability at high enthalpy and the role of high-temperature effects. Although the stability solvers considering thermochemical nonequilibrium were best at estimating the measured second-mode frequency (f2M ≈ 1250 kHz for shot 2990, f2M ≈ 1235 kHz for shot 3019), they overpredicted the most amplified frequency by approximately 16–23%. A moderate spread in the predicted most amplified frequency was also observed between the different solvers. The solvers estimated a most amplified frequency range of approximately 1450–1550 kHz for shot 2990 and approximately 1525–1650 kHz for shot 3019. There was also significant inconsistency observed in predicting the peak N-factor magnitude, ranging from N = 12.5–16 for shot 2990 and from N = 12.3–19 for shot 3019.
KW - Compressible Flow
KW - Computational Fluid Dynamics
KW - Freestream Mach Number
KW - Hypersonic Boundary Layer Transition
KW - Numerical Stability
KW - Parabolized Stability Equations
KW - Short Time Fourier Transform
KW - Stagnation Enthalpy
KW - Temperature Effects
KW - Thermodynamic Properties
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105015211726
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105015211726#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.2514/1.J064456
DO - 10.2514/1.J064456
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105015211726
SN - 0001-1452
VL - 63
SP - 3895
EP - 3905
JO - AIAA Journal
JF - AIAA Journal
IS - 9
ER -