TY - JOUR
T1 - How Does Ethical Leadership Trickle Down? Test of an Integrative Dual-Process Model
AU - Wang, Zhen
AU - Xu, Haoying
AU - Liu, Yukun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
PY - 2018/12/1
Y1 - 2018/12/1
N2 - Although the trickle-down effect of ethical leadership has been documented in the literature, its underlying mechanism still remains largely unclear. To address this gap, we develop a cross-level dual-process model to explain how the effect occurs. Drawing on social learning theory, we hypothesize that the ethical leadership of high-level managers could cascade to middle-level supervisors via its impact on middle-level supervisors’ two ethical expectations. Using a sample of 69 middle-level supervisors and 381 subordinates across 69 sub-branches from a large banking firm in China, we found that middle-level supervisors’ ethical efficacy expectation and unethical behavior–punishment expectation (as one form of ethical outcome expectations) accounted for the trickle-down effect. The explanatory role of middle-level supervisors’ ethical behavior–reward expectation (as the other form of ethical outcome expectations), however, was not supported. The theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
AB - Although the trickle-down effect of ethical leadership has been documented in the literature, its underlying mechanism still remains largely unclear. To address this gap, we develop a cross-level dual-process model to explain how the effect occurs. Drawing on social learning theory, we hypothesize that the ethical leadership of high-level managers could cascade to middle-level supervisors via its impact on middle-level supervisors’ two ethical expectations. Using a sample of 69 middle-level supervisors and 381 subordinates across 69 sub-branches from a large banking firm in China, we found that middle-level supervisors’ ethical efficacy expectation and unethical behavior–punishment expectation (as one form of ethical outcome expectations) accounted for the trickle-down effect. The explanatory role of middle-level supervisors’ ethical behavior–reward expectation (as the other form of ethical outcome expectations), however, was not supported. The theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
KW - Ethical efficacy expectation
KW - Ethical leadership
KW - Ethical outcome expectation
KW - Social learning theory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991744571&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991744571&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10551-016-3361-x
DO - 10.1007/s10551-016-3361-x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84991744571
SN - 0167-4544
VL - 153
SP - 691
EP - 705
JO - Journal of Business Ethics
JF - Journal of Business Ethics
IS - 3
ER -