TY - CHAP
T1 - Inverse Methods
AU - Weickenmeier, Johannes
AU - Mazza, Edoardo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - The mechanical properties of skin have been studied for several decades; yet, to this day reported stiffness values for full-thickness skin or individual layers such as the epidermis, papillary dermis, reticular dermis, and subcutis vary drastically. In vivo and ex vivo measurement techniques include extension, indentation, and suction tests. At the same time, several new imaging modalities emerged that visualize tissue microstructure at length scales ranging from the cell to the organ level. Informed by the experimental characterization of mechanobiological skin properties, computational skin models aim at predicting the soft tissue response under various physiological conditions such as skin growth, scar tissue formation, and surgical interventions. The identification of corresponding model parameters plays a major role in improving the predictive capabilities of such constitutive models. Here, we first provide an overview of the most common measurement techniques and imaging modalities. We then discuss popular methods used for model parameter identification based on inverse methods.
AB - The mechanical properties of skin have been studied for several decades; yet, to this day reported stiffness values for full-thickness skin or individual layers such as the epidermis, papillary dermis, reticular dermis, and subcutis vary drastically. In vivo and ex vivo measurement techniques include extension, indentation, and suction tests. At the same time, several new imaging modalities emerged that visualize tissue microstructure at length scales ranging from the cell to the organ level. Informed by the experimental characterization of mechanobiological skin properties, computational skin models aim at predicting the soft tissue response under various physiological conditions such as skin growth, scar tissue formation, and surgical interventions. The identification of corresponding model parameters plays a major role in improving the predictive capabilities of such constitutive models. Here, we first provide an overview of the most common measurement techniques and imaging modalities. We then discuss popular methods used for model parameter identification based on inverse methods.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085362652&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85085362652&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-13279-8_6
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-13279-8_6
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85085362652
T3 - Studies in Mechanobiology, Tissue Engineering and Biomaterials
SP - 193
EP - 213
BT - Studies in Mechanobiology, Tissue Engineering and Biomaterials
ER -