Laws of biological design: A reply to John Beatty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper, I argue against John Beatty's position in his paper "The Evolutionary Contingency Thesis" by counterexample. Beatty argues that there are no distinctly biological laws because the outcomes of the evolutionary processes are contingent. I argue that the heart of the Caspar-Klug theory of virus structure-that spherical virus capsids consist of 60T subunits (where T = k2 + hk + h2 and h and k are integers)-is a distinctly biological law even if the existence of spherical viruses is evolutionarily contingent.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)379-389
Number of pages11
JournalBiology and Philosophy
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010

Keywords

  • Adaptationism
  • Biological design
  • Contingency
  • Degrees of necessity
  • Laws of biology
  • Laws of design
  • Scientific laws
  • Stephen Jay Gould
  • Virology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Laws of biological design: A reply to John Beatty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this