Abstract
Some of the major objectives of the JPEG 2000 still image coding standard were compression and memory efficiency, lossy to lossless coding, support for continuous-tone to bi-level images, error resilience, and random access to regions of interest. This paper will provide readers with some insight on various features and functionalities supported by a baseline JPEG 2000-compliant codec. Three JPEG 2000 software implementations (Kakadu, JasPer, JJ2000) are compared with several other codecs, including JPEG, JBIG, JPEG-LS, MPEG-4 VTC and H.264 intra coding. This study can serve as a guideline for users to estimate the effectiveness of JPEG 2000 for various applications, and to select optimal parameters according to specific application requirements.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 27-57 |
| Number of pages | 31 |
| Journal | Multimedia Tools and Applications |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2005 |
Keywords
- Image compression
- JPEG-2000
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Performance analysis of the JPEG 2000 image coding standard'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver