Abstract
The determination of the nonlinear response of structural members subjected to a close-in explosive threat is challenging. There are various ways to quantify the blast resistance and mode of failure of a structural member, e.g. experimental testing which is expensive and time-consuming, or high-fidelity finite element analysis which is also time-consuming. The familiar analytical approach using an equivalent single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) system is much less costly, however, as will be shown in this paper, may lack accuracy. Based on an extensive study of the nonlinear response of a ground-floor column of a high-rise building subjected to close-in explosive threat, using nonlinear explicit finite element analysis as well as analytical single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) system approach, the source of inaccuracy of the analytical approach is identified, and an empirical approach using Multivariable Polynomial Regression (MPR) is established. The paper presents a head-to-head comparison of the results produced by finite element analysis, the SDOF system analysis, the empirical approach, and experimental test data to emphasize the accuracy and time-efficiency of the proposed approach. The approach has the potential to establish itself as a time-efficient preliminary vulnerability assessment methodology of structural members subjected to close-in blast loading.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 55-66 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Engineering Structures |
| Volume | 128 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Dec 2016 |
Keywords
- Accuracy
- Blast analysis
- Empirical approach
- Multivariable polynomial regression
- Preliminary vulnerability assessment
- Validation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Preliminary and time-efficient vulnerability assessment of structural columns subjected to blast loading'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver