Recent arrival of faint cluster galaxies on the red sequence: Luminosity functions from 119 deg2 of CFHTLS

Ting Lu, David G. Gilbank, Michael L. Balogh, Adam Bognat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

The global star formation rate has decreased significantly since z ∼ 1, for reasons that are not well understood. Red-sequence galaxies, dominating in galaxy clusters, represent the population that have had their star formation shut off, and may therefore be the key to this problem. In this work, we select 127 rich galaxy clusters at 0.17 ≤ z ≤ 0.36, from 119 deg2 of the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey (CFHTLS) optical imaging data, and construct the r′-band red-sequence luminosity functions (LFs). We show that the faint end of the LF is very sensitive to how red-sequence galaxies are selected, and an optimal way to minimize the contamination from the blue cloud is to mirror galaxies on the redder side of the colour-magnitude relation. The LFs of our sample have a significant inflexion centred at, suggesting a mixture of two populations. Combining our survey with low-redshift samples constructed from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, we show that there is no strong evolution of the faint end of the LF (or the red-sequence dwarf-to-giant ratio) over the redshift range 0.2 ≲ z ≲ 0.4, but from z ∼ 0.2 to ∼0 the relative number of red-sequence dwarf galaxies has increased by a factor of ∼3, implying a significant build-up of the faint end of the cluster red sequence over the last 2.5 Gyr.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1858-1876
Number of pages19
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume399
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2009

Keywords

  • Galaxies: clusters: general
  • Galaxies: evolution
  • Galaxies: luminosity function, mass function

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recent arrival of faint cluster galaxies on the red sequence: Luminosity functions from 119 deg2 of CFHTLS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this