The effect of content depth and deviation on online review helpfulness: Evidence from double-hurdle model

Chaojiang Wu, Feng Mai, Xiaolin Li

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

46 Scopus citations

Abstract

How does the content of a product review shape its perceived value? We propose two information theory-based constructs derived from probabilistic topic models and show their relationship with review helpfulness. The first construct, content depth, quantifies the breadth-depth tradeoff of a review and has an informational influence on readers’ voting behavior. The second construct, content deviation, indicates the deviance of the review content in comparison with others and exerts a normative influence on readers’ voting behavior. Noting the possibility that a review can get voted but has zero helpfulness score, we use a double-hurdle model to simultaneously estimate the probability of a review being voted and its helpfulness. The analyses on three product categories show that reviews with more depth and less content deviation are rated more helpful. Further, the relationships are moderated by a number of factors, including the deviation of numerical rating, recency of the review, and the reputation of the reviewer. The research contributes to the literature by showing how the content of a review and the interaction of content and numerical ratings jointly create value for consumers.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103408
JournalInformation and Management
Volume58
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2021

Keywords

  • Dual-process theory
  • Information theory
  • Online reviews
  • Review helpfulness
  • Text mining

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of content depth and deviation on online review helpfulness: Evidence from double-hurdle model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this