Abstract
We conjecture that adoption of agricultural biotech innovation imposes relationship-specific investments that exacerbate hold-up costs between biotech producers and farmers. Moreover, the increasing presence of biotech reduces biodiversity, which is a significant negative externality on food production across farms. As such, increasing biotech has the potential to exacerbate food insecurity. By contrast, certified organic operations have the potential to have the opposite effect. We examine 15 agrarian states in the U.S. and find evidence strongly consistent with these propositions. We discuss implications for policy, practice, and future research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1089-1109 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Industry and Innovation |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 2 Zero Hunger
Keywords
- Biotechnology
- certified organic operations
- food insecurity
- intellectual property
- social innovation
- technological innovation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The unintended consequences of biotechnology innovation adoption'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver