Abstract
The ability of two-equation turbulence models to accurately predict separated flows is analyzed from a combined theoretical and computational standpoint. Turbulent flow past a backward-facing step is chosen as a test case in an effort to resolve the various conflicting results that have been published during the past decade concerning the performance of two-equation models. The results obtained demonstrate that errors in the reported predictions of the K-∈ model have two major origins: 1) numerical problems arising from inadequate resolution, and 2) inaccurate predictions for normal Reynolds stress differences arising from the use of anisotropic eddy viscosity. Inadequacies in near-wall modeling play a substantially smaller role. Detailed calculations are presented that strongly indicate that the standard K-∈ model-when modified with an independently calibrated anisotropic eddy viscosity-can yield surprisingly good predictions for the back-step problem.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1314-1320 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | AIAA journal |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 1992 |