Abstract
Early attempts in the 1960s at constructing a classification scheme for viruses were phenetic and focused on structural properties of the virion. Over time, the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) has refined its definition of a virus species to include an appeal to evolutionary history. The current ICTV definition defines a viral species in terms of monophyly. The existence of prolific horizontal genetic transfer (HGT) among various groups of viruses presents a challenge to this definition. I argue that the proper response to this mode of evolution is to allow for radical pluralism. Some viruses can be members of more than one species; others don't form species at all and should be classified using new reticulate categories.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 64-70 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences |
| Volume | 59 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Oct 2016 |
Keywords
- Horizontal gene transfer
- ICTV
- Mosaic genomes
- Radical pluralism
- Viral species
- Viral taxonomy
- Virus classification
- Virus species
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What is a virus species? Radical pluralism in viral taxonomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver