Who is the Broker Matters: How Publics Respond to Crisis Related Cross-Sector Networks on Social Media?

Jingyi Sun, Aimei Yang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Multi-organizational cross-sector partnerships on social media involving nonprofits, governments, and corporations are increasingly important for addressing complex social issues. Such large-scale cross-sector networks would not be possible without brokers who connect otherwise disconnected clusters. Nevertheless, cross-sector brokers are not always positively received by the public. Drawing from the brokerage typology literature, we classify five distinctive types of brokers (i.e., representative, gatekeeper, liaison, itinerant, and coordinator) and explore public responses associated with them, and how such effects spill over to connected same-sector organizations. Our findings show that different types of brokers receive different public responses, which are moderated by organizations’ sectors. In particular, nonprofits playing brokerage roles are more likely to be positively received by the public compared to government agencies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)365-381
Number of pages17
JournalVoluntas
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2025

Keywords

  • Brokerage typology
  • Cross-sector networks
  • First- and second-order brokerage
  • Interorganizational network

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Who is the Broker Matters: How Publics Respond to Crisis Related Cross-Sector Networks on Social Media?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this